Bomberdude
 Status: Hidden
Joined: 14 Jul 2017 Posts: 54
 |
#1 Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2017 11:32 am |
 |
I recently looked at Gaming Magazine reviews for Bomberman 64/Baku Bomberman. The game reviewers were criticizing the Game for the changes it made to the Battle mode. I found their criticisms to be extremely unfair. They were basically criticizing the game because the Battle mode didn't take place in a grid, giving the game mediocre scores. They didn't even treat the Adventure/Story mode fairly (I think one critic said that Normal Mode isn't the highlight which is a LIE.). One butthurt critic talked about their memories of playing DynaBlaster (screw that name) being ruined because of the changes. Personally, I think these "reviews" are deplorable. I have a LONG history with Game Magazines/Websites (They called Mega Man X5 primitive. Were they drunk?).
Here is a link to the awful reviews. What do you think?
http://www.randomhoohaas.flyingomelette.com/bomb/n64-1/ref.html#magazine
A game reviewer said that Single Player Super Bomberman 2 sucks. YEAH. That's why i hate dealing with Battle Mode Fanboys. |
|